Re: [PATCH v4 00/26] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3
From: Daniel Thompson
Date: Fri May 25 2018 - 08:00:27 EST
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:49:06AM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> This series is a continuation of the work started by Daniel [1]. The goal
> is to use GICv3 interrupt priorities to simulate an NMI.
>
> To achieve this, set two priorities, one for standard interrupts and
> another, higher priority, for NMIs. Whenever we want to disable interrupts,
> we mask the standard priority instead so NMIs can still be raised. Some
> corner cases though still require to actually mask all interrupts
> effectively disabling the NMI.
>
> Currently, only PPIs and SPIs can be set as NMIs. IPIs being currently
> hardcoded IRQ numbers, there isn't a generic interface to set SGIs as NMI
> for now. I don't think there is any reason LPIs should be allowed to be set
> as NMI as they do not have an active state.
> When an NMI is active on a CPU, no other NMI can be triggered on the CPU.
>
> After the big refactoring I get performances similar to the ones I had
> in v3[2], reposting old results here:
>
> - "hackbench 200 process 1000" (average over 20 runs)
> +-----------+----------+------------+------------------+
> | | native | PMR guest | v4.17-rc6 guest |
> +-----------+----------+------------+------------------+
> | PMR host | 40.0336s | 39.3039s | 39.2044s |
> | v4.17-rc6 | 40.4040s | 39.6011s | 39.1147s |
> +-----------+----------+------------+------------------+
>
> - Kernel build from defconfig:
> PMR host: 13m45.743s
> v4.17-rc6: 13m40.400s
>
> I'll try to post more detailed benchmarks later if I find notable
> differences with the previous version.
Do you have a public git tree anywhere... I *can* apply 26 patches from
e-mail but I'd rather pull them!
Daniel.
>
>
> Requirements to use this:
> - Have GICv3
> - SCR_EL3.FIQ is set to 1 when linux runs or have single security state
> - Select Kernel Feature -> Use ICC system registers for IRQ masking
>
>
> * Patches 1 to 4 aim at applying some alternatives early in the boot
> process, including the feature for priority masking.
>
> * Patches 5 to 7 and 17 lightly refactor bits of GIC driver to make things
> nicer for the rest of the series.
>
> * Patches 8 to 10 and 16 ensure the logic of daifflags remains valid
> after arch_local_irq flags use ICC_PMR_EL1.
>
> * Patches 11 to 14 do some required PMR treatement in order for things to
> work when the system uses priority masking.
>
> * Patches 15, 18, 19, 20 and 21 actually make the changes to use
> ICC_PMR_EL1 for priority masking/unmasking when disabling/enabling
> interrupts.
>
> * Patches 22 to 26 provide support for pseudo-NMI in the GICv3 driver
> when priority masking is enabled.
>
>
> Changes since V3[2]:
> * Big refactoring. As suggested by Marc Z., some of the bigger patches
> needed to be split into smaller one.
>
> * Try to reduce the amount of #ifdef for the new feature by introducing
> an individual cpufeature for priority masking
>
> * Do not track which alternatives have been applied (was a bit dodgy
> anyway), and use an alternative for VHE cpu_enable callback
>
> * Fix a build failure with arm by adding the correct RPR accessors
>
> * Added Suggested-by tags for changes from comming or inspired by Daniel's
> series. Do let me know if you feel I missed something and am not giving
> you due credit.
>
> Changes since V2[3]:
> * Series rebase to v4.17-rc6
>
> * Adapt pathces 1 and 2 to the rework of cpufeatures framework
>
> * Use the group0 detection scheme in the GICv3 driver to identify
> the priority view, and drop the use of a fake interrupt
>
> * Add the case for a GIC configured in a single security state
>
> * Use local_daif_restore instead of local_irq_enable the first time
> we enable interrupts after a bp hardening in the handling of a kernel
> entry. Otherwise PRS.I remains set...
>
> Changes since V1[4]:
> * Series rebased to v4.15-rc8.
>
> * Check for arm64_early_features in this_cpu_has_cap (spotted by Suzuki).
>
> * Fix issue where debug exception were not masked when enabling debug in
> mdscr_el1.
>
> Changes since RFC[5]:
> * The series was rebased to v4.15-rc2 which implied some changes mainly
> related to the work on exception entries and daif flags by James Morse.
>
> - The first patch in the previous series was dropped because no longer
> applicable.
>
> - With the semantics James introduced of "inheriting" daif flags,
> handling of PMR on exception entry is simplified as PMR is not altered
> by taking an exception and already inherited from previous state.
>
> - James pointed out that taking a PseudoNMI before reading the FAR_EL1
> register should not be allowed as per the TRM (D10.2.29):
> "FAR_EL1 is made UNKNOWN on an exception return from EL1."
> So in this submission PSR.I bit is cleared only after FAR_EL1 is read.
>
> * For KVM, only deal with PMR unmasking/restoring in common code, and VHE
> specific code makes sure PSR.I bit is set when necessary.
>
> * When detecting the GIC priority view (patch 5), wait for an actual
> interrupt instead of trying only once.
>
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg525077.html
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/21/276
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/17/335
> [4] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg620763.html
> [5] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg610736.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> Julien
>
> -->
>
> Daniel Thompson (1):
> arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process
>
> Julien Thierry (25):
> arm64: cpufeature: Set SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF as a boot system feature
> arm64: cpufeature: Add cpufeature for IRQ priority masking
> arm64: cpufeature: Use alternatives for VHE cpu_enable
> irqchip/gic: Unify GIC priority definitions
> irqchip/gic: Lower priority of GIC interrupts
> irqchip/gic-v3: Remove acknowledge loop
> arm64: daifflags: Use irqflags functions for daifflags
> arm64: Use daifflag_restore after bp_hardening
> arm64: Delay daif masking for user return
> arm64: Make PMR part of task context
> arm64: Unmask PMR before going idle
> arm/arm64: gic-v3: Add helper functions to manage IRQ priorities
> arm64: kvm: Unmask PMR before entering guest
> arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking
> arm64: daifflags: Include PMR in daifflags restore operations
> irqchip/gic-v3: Factor group0 detection into functions
> irqchip/gic-v3: Do not overwrite PMR value
> irqchip/gic-v3: Switch to PMR masking after IRQ acknowledge
> arm64: Switch to PMR masking when starting CPUs
> arm64: Add build option for IRQ masking via priority
> arm64: Detect current view of GIC priorities
> irqchip/gic: Add functions to access irq priorities
> irqchip/gic-v3: Add base support for pseudo-NMI
> irqchip/gic-v3: Provide NMI handlers
> irqchip/gic-v3: Allow interrupts to be set as pseudo-NMI
>
> Documentation/arm64/booting.txt | 5 +
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 33 ++++
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 15 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/alternative.h | 3 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h | 32 ++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 17 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 3 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h | 32 ++--
> arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h | 3 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h | 100 ++++++++---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 13 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 30 +++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 35 +++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 67 ++++++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 35 ++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 12 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 17 ++
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 5 +-
> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 18 ++
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c | 10 ++
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.h | 2 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 318 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> include/linux/interrupt.h | 1 +
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h | 6 +
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h | 5 -
> 31 files changed, 719 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.9.1