Hi Abhishek,
On Fri, 25 May 2018 17:51:31 +0530, Abhishek Sahu
<absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If nand-ecc-strength specified in DT, then controller will use
this ECC strength otherwise ECC strength will be calculated
according to chip requirement and available OOB size.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
* Changes from v2:
NONE
* Changes from v1:
NEW PATCH
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt
index 73d336be..f246aa0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/qcom_nandc.txt
@@ -45,11 +45,13 @@ Required properties:
number (e.g., 0, 1, 2, etc.)
- #address-cells: see partition.txt
- #size-cells: see partition.txt
-- nand-ecc-strength: see nand.txt
- nand-ecc-step-size: must be 512. see nand.txt for more details.
I think you can squash the two dt-bindings commits as they are tightly
related to each other.
Optional properties:
- nand-bus-width: see nand.txt
+- nand-ecc-strength: see nand.txt. If not specified, then ECC strength will
+ be used according to chip requirement and available
+ OOB size.
Each nandcs device node may optionally contain a 'partitions' sub-node, which
further contains sub-nodes describing the flash partition mapping. See