Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings

[Taniya Das]

Hello Rob,

Could you please suggest if the below looks okay to be implemented?

On 5/24/2018 11:13 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-05-18, 10:48, Taniya Das wrote:
> > Hello Rob, Viresh,
> >
> > Thank you for the comments. If I understand correctly, the device tree nodes
> > should look something like the below.
> >
> > Though I am not sure if any vendor name could be associated in the cpu
> > nodes.
>
> Well Rob said Yes to that I think.
>
> > Please suggest if my understanding is wrong.
> >
> > cpu@0 {
> > 	qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table0>;
> > 	â
> > };
> >
> > same follows for cpu 1/2/3
> >
> > cpu@400 {
> > 	qcom,freq-domain = <&freq_domain_table1>;
> > 	â
> > };
> > same follows for cpu 5/6/7
> >
> > freq_domain_table0 : freq_table {
> > 	reg = < >, < >, < > ;
> > 	reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
> > };
> >
> > freq_domain_table1 : freq_table {
> > 	reg = < >, < >, < > ;
> > 	reg-names = "perf_base", "lut_base", "en_base";
> > };
>
> Mostly yes.

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--