Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] soc: qcom: rpmh powerdomain driver
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed May 30 2018 - 05:44:48 EST
On 30-05-18, 14:25, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> []...
>
> >>> +Required Properties:
> >>> + - compatible: Should be one of the following
> >>> + * qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd: RPMh powerdomain for the sdm845 family of SoC
> >>> + - power-domain-cells: number of cells in power domain specifier
> >>> + must be 1
> >>> + - operating-points-v2: Phandle to the OPP table for the power-domain.
> >>> + Refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt
> >>> + and Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/qcom-opp.txt for more details
> >>> +
> >>> +Example:
> >>> +
> >>> + rpmhpd: power-controller {
> >>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd";
> >>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> >>> + operating-points-v2 = <&rpmhpd_opp_table>,
> >>> + <&rpmhpd_opp_table>,
> >>> + <&rpmhpd_opp_table>,
> >>> + <&rpmhpd_opp_table>,
> >>> + <&rpmhpd_opp_table>,
> >>> + <&rpmhpd_opp_table>,
> >>> + <&rpmhpd_opp_table>,
> >>> + <&rpmhpd_opp_table>,
> >>> + <&rpmhpd_opp_table>;
> >>
> >> Can this be changed to simply:
> >> operating-points-v2 = <&rpmhpd_opp_table>;
> >>
> >> The opp binding documentation [1] states that this should be ok:
> >>
> >> If only one phandle is available, then the same OPP table will be used
> >> for all power domains provided by the power domain provider.
> >
> > thanks, I mentioned this to Viresh but didn't realize he fixed it up.
> > Will remove the redundant entries.
>
> Looks like the kernel implementation does not handle this yet, and I get
> an error adding the OPP tables for the powerdomains if I just specify
> a single OPP table phandle.
>
> Viresh, is this expected with the latest patches in linux-next?
>
> It would be good if I can specify just one phandle instead of coping
> the same phandle n times.
Please try this untested hunk:
diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
index 6d15f05bfc28..7af0ddec936b 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/of.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
@@ -554,11 +554,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_add_table);
int dev_pm_opp_of_add_table_indexed(struct device *dev, int index)
{
struct device_node *opp_np;
- int ret;
+ int ret, count;
+again:
opp_np = _opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(dev->of_node, index);
- if (!opp_np)
+ if (!opp_np) {
+ /*
+ * If only one phandle is present, then the same OPP table
+ * applies for all index requests.
+ */
+ count = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node,
+ "operating-points-v2", NULL);
+ if (count == 1 && index) {
+ index = 0;
+ goto again;
+ }
+
return -ENODEV;
+ }
ret = _of_add_opp_table_v2(dev, opp_np);
of_node_put(opp_np);