Re: dm-writecache: fix compilation issue with !DAX
From: Mike Snitzer
Date: Wed May 30 2018 - 09:13:35 EST
On Wed, May 30 2018 at 8:22am -0400,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 29 May 2018, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>
> > As reported by Arnd (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/28/1697), dm-writecache
> > will fail with link errors in configs where DAX isn't present:
> >
> > drivers/md/dm-writecache.o: In function `writecache_ctr':
> > dm-writecache.c:(.text+0x1fdc): undefined reference to `dax_read_lock'
> > dm-writecache.c:(.text+0x2004): undefined reference to `dax_direct_access'
> > dm-writecache.c:(.text+0x21cc): undefined reference to `dax_read_unlock'
> >
> > Fix this by following the lead of the other DM modules and wrapping calls
> > to the generic DAX code in #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DAX_DRIVER) blocks.
> >
> > We also expand the failure case for the 'p' (persistent memory) flag so
> > that fails on both architectures that don't support persistent memory and
> > on kernels that don't have DAX support configured. This prevents us from
> > ever hitting the BUG() in the persistent_memory_claim() stub.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > index 92af65fdf4af..1c2b53ae1a96 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> > @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ static void wc_unlock(struct dm_writecache *wc)
> > mutex_unlock(&wc->lock);
> > }
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DAX_DRIVER)
>
> We already have #if(n)def DM_WRITECACHE_ONLY_SSD
>
> There is no need to use another macro for the same purpose.
I removed DM_WRITECACHE_ONLY_SSD because it wasn't needed, this is the
split out commit that I have since folded in:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/snitzer/linux.git/commit/?h=dm-4.18-writecache-wip&id=e7fd3d1c05659f7e1295178290fbdaebf36becdc
Ross's patch effectively builds ontop of that.
Mike