Re: [PATCH 6/9] clk: davinci: pll: allow dev == NULL

[Michael Turquette]

Hi David,

Quoting David Lechner (2018-05-25 11:11:47)
> This modifies the TI Davinci PLL clock driver to allow for the case
> when dev == NULL. On some (most) SoCs that use this driver, the PLL
> clock needs to be registered during early boot because it is used
> for clocksource/clkevent and there will be no platform device available.

A lot of this stuff feels like a step backwards. E.g:

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c
> index 23a24c944f1d..2eb981e61185 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/clk/davinci.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> @@ -223,6 +224,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops dm365_pll_ops = {
>  
>  /**
>   * davinci_pll_div_register - common *DIV clock implementation
> + * @dev: The PLL platform device or NULL
>   * @name: the clock name
>   * @parent_name: the parent clock name
>   * @reg: the *DIV register
> @@ -240,17 +242,21 @@ static struct clk *davinci_pll_div_register(struct device *dev,
>         const struct clk_ops *divider_ops = &clk_divider_ops;
>         struct clk_gate *gate;
>         struct clk_divider *divider;
> +       struct clk *clk;
> +       int ret;
>  
> -       gate = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*gate), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       gate = kzalloc(sizeof(*gate), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!gate)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>         gate->reg = reg;
>         gate->bit_idx = DIV_ENABLE_SHIFT;
>  
> -       divider = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*divider), GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (!divider)
> -               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +       divider = kzalloc(sizeof(*divider), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!divider) {
> +               ret = -ENOMEM;
> +               goto err_free_gate;
> +       }
>  
>         divider->reg = reg;
>         divider->shift = DIV_RATIO_SHIFT;

Oh no my poor devm_ helpers!

I understand that we need to support early boot drivers better, so this
patch can be merged.

However I'm curious if you're tracking Bartosz's early_platform_driver
efforts? Converting to that if it is ever merged would likely be
cleaner:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180511162028.20616-1-brgl@xxxxxxxx

Best regards,
Mike