Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on POWER9

From: Andrew Donnellan
Date: Thu May 31 2018 - 00:42:40 EST


On 11/05/18 16:13, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>

In order to successfully issue as_notify, an AFU needs to know the TID
to notify, which in turn means that this information should be
available in userspace so it can be communicated to the AFU.

Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Comments below.

+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+static long afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait(struct ocxl_context *ctx,
+ struct ocxl_ioctl_p9_wait __user *uarg)
+{
+ struct ocxl_ioctl_p9_wait arg;
+
+ memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR)) {
+ enum ocxl_context_status status;
+
+ // Locks both status & tidr
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->status_mutex);
+ if (!ctx->tidr) {
+ if (set_thread_tidr(current))
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ ctx->tidr = current->thread.tidr;
+ }
+
+ status = ctx->status;
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->status_mutex);
+
+ if (status == ATTACHED) {
+ int rc;
+ struct link *link = ctx->afu->fn->link;
+
+ rc = ocxl_link_update_pe(link, ctx->pasid, ctx->tidr);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ arg.thread_id = ctx->tidr;
+ } else
+ return -ENOENT;

I didn't pick this up before - please please please use braces on both sides of the if here.

+
+ if (copy_to_user(uarg, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif

diff --git a/include/misc/ocxl.h b/include/misc/ocxl.h
index 51ccf76db293..9ff6ddc28e22 100644
--- a/include/misc/ocxl.h
+++ b/include/misc/ocxl.h
@@ -188,6 +188,15 @@ extern int ocxl_link_add_pe(void *link_handle, int pasid, u32 pidr, u32 tidr,
void (*xsl_err_cb)(void *data, u64 addr, u64 dsisr),
void *xsl_err_data);
+/**
+ * Update values within a Process Element
+ *
+ * link_handle: the link handle associated with the process element
+ * pasid: the PASID for the AFU context
+ * tid: the new thread id for the process element
+ */
+extern int ocxl_link_update_pe(void *link_handle, int pasid, __u16 tid);

My earlier comment about __u16 vs u16 applies for this declaration (and the body declaration) as well

--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan@xxxxxxxxxxx IBM Australia Limited