Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: actions: Add interrupt support for OWL S900 SoC
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Sun Jun 03 2018 - 04:38:03 EST
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add interrupt support for Actions Semi OWL S900 SoC.
> + port = owl_gpio_get_port(pctrl, &gpio);
> + if (WARN_ON(port == NULL))
> + return;
At which circumstances the above possible?
> + port = owl_gpio_get_port(pctrl, &gpio);
> + if (WARN_ON(port == NULL))
> + return;
Ditto.
> + port = owl_gpio_get_port(pctrl, &gpio);
> + if (WARN_ON(port == NULL))
> + return;
Ditto.
> + port = owl_gpio_get_port(pctrl, &gpio);
> + if (WARN_ON(port == NULL))
> + return -ENODEV;
Ditto.
> + for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) {
> + irqno = irq_create_mapping(pctrl->domain, i);
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irqno, &owl_gpio_irq_chip,
> + handle_edge_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irqno, pctrl);
> + }
I'm not sure the handle_edge_irq() is a correct handler here. It would
be handle_bad_irq() until IRQ has been requested properly.
No?
> +/* GPIO TYPE Bit Definition */
> +#define OWL_GPIO_INT_LEVEL_HIGH 0
> +#define OWL_GPIO_INT_LEVEL_LOW 1
> +#define OWL_GPIO_INT_EDGE_RISING 2
> +#define OWL_GPIO_INT_EDGE_FALLING 3
> +#define OWL_GPIO_INT_MASK 3
GENMASK?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko