[PATCH 4.14 49/52] powerpc/mm/slice: Remove intermediate bitmap copy

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>

commit 326691ad4f179e6edc7eb1271e618dd673e4736d upstream.

bitmap_or() and bitmap_andnot() can work properly with dst identical
to src1 or src2. There is no need of an intermediate result bitmap
that is copied back to dst in a second step.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c |   12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slice.c
@@ -379,21 +379,17 @@ static unsigned long slice_find_area(str
 
 static inline void slice_or_mask(struct slice_mask *dst, struct slice_mask *src)
 {
-	DECLARE_BITMAP(result, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
-
 	dst->low_slices |= src->low_slices;
-	bitmap_or(result, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
-	bitmap_copy(dst->high_slices, result, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
+	bitmap_or(dst->high_slices, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices,
+		  SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
 }
 
 static inline void slice_andnot_mask(struct slice_mask *dst, struct slice_mask *src)
 {
-	DECLARE_BITMAP(result, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
-
 	dst->low_slices &= ~src->low_slices;
 
-	bitmap_andnot(result, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
-	bitmap_copy(dst->high_slices, result, SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
+	bitmap_andnot(dst->high_slices, dst->high_slices, src->high_slices,
+		      SLICE_NUM_HIGH);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES