Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] mfd: da9063: Use REGMAP_IRQ_REG

[Marek Vasut]

On 06/04/2018 02:26 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
> 
>> Convert the regmap_irq table to use REGMAP_IRQ_REG().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>> V3: New patch
>> Note: A sed oneliner was used:
>>       sed -i "/\[DA9063_IRQ_/ {N;N;N;s/\n//g;s/.*\[\(DA9063_IRQ_[^]]\+\)].*reg_offset = \([^,]\+\),.* = \([^,]\+\),.*/\tREGMAP_IRQ_REG(\1, \2, \3),/}" drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c | 145 ++++++++++-------------------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> index 207bbfe55449..5b406ecfc14a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
>> @@ -28,125 +28,38 @@
>>  
>>  static const struct regmap_irq da9063_irqs[] = {
>>  	/* DA9063 event A register */
>> -	[DA9063_IRQ_ONKEY] = {
>> -		.reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> -		.mask = DA9063_M_ONKEY,
>> -	},
>> -	[DA9063_IRQ_ALARM] = {
>> -		.reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> -		.mask = DA9063_M_ALARM,
>> -	},
>> -	[DA9063_IRQ_TICK] = {
>> -		.reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> -		.mask = DA9063_M_TICK,
>> -	},
>> -	[DA9063_IRQ_ADC_RDY] = {
>> -		.reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> -		.mask = DA9063_M_ADC_RDY,
>> -	},
>> -	[DA9063_IRQ_SEQ_RDY] = {
>> -		.reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
>> -		.mask = DA9063_M_SEQ_RDY,
>> -	},
>> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ONKEY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ONKEY),
>> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ALARM, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ALARM),
>> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_TICK, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_TICK),
>> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ADC_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ADC_RDY),
>> +	REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_SEQ_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_SEQ_RDY),
> 
> Nice, but I think checkpatch.pl would complain.
> 
> Better to break after the first argument I think.

Doesn't really help the readability, but done.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut