Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 4 (md/dm-writecache.c)

[Mike Snitzer]

On Mon, Jun 04 2018 at 12:06pm -0400,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 06/04/2018 04:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20180601:
> > 
> 
> on x86_64:
> 
> In file included from ../drivers/md/dm-writecache.c:8:0:
> ../drivers/md/dm-writecache.c: In function âwritecache_statusâ:
> ../include/linux/compiler.h:61:17: warning: format â%ldâ expects argument of type âlong intâ, but argument 4 has type âintâ [-Wformat=]
>    static struct ftrace_branch_data   \
>                  ^
> ../include/linux/device-mapper.h:550:46: note: in definition of macro âDMEMITâ
>       0 : scnprintf(result + sz, maxlen - sz, x))
>                                               ^
> ../include/linux/compiler.h:48:24: note: in expansion of macro â__branch_check__â
>  #  define unlikely(x) (__branch_check__(x, 0, __builtin_constant_p(x)))
>                         ^
> ../drivers/md/dm-writecache.c:414:35: note: in expansion of macro âunlikelyâ
>  #define writecache_has_error(wc) (unlikely(READ_ONCE((wc)->error)))
>                                    ^
> ../include/linux/compiler.h:56:23: note: in expansion of macro â__trace_ifâ
>  #define if(cond, ...) __trace_if( (cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) )
>                        ^
> ../include/linux/compiler.h:251:2: note: in expansion of macro âifâ
>   if (check)       \
>   ^
> ../include/linux/compiler.h:258:22: note: in expansion of macro â__READ_ONCEâ
>  #define READ_ONCE(x) __READ_ONCE(x, 1)
>                       ^
> ../drivers/md/dm-writecache.c:414:44: note: in expansion of macro âREAD_ONCEâ
>  #define writecache_has_error(wc) (unlikely(READ_ONCE((wc)->error)))
>                                             ^
> ../drivers/md/dm-writecache.c:2196:32: note: in expansion of macro âwritecache_has_errorâ
>    DMEMIT("%ld %llu %llu %llu", writecache_has_error(wc),
>                                 ^
> 
> s/%ld/%d/

AFAICT, this is the correct fix:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10438865/

Not seen any response to it (Steven and Ingo were emailed, Arnd and LKML
were cc'd).

Mike