Re: [PATCHv2 03/16] atomics/treewide: make atomic64_inc_not_zero() optional

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Tue, 29 May 2018 08:43:33 PDT (-0700), mark.rutland@xxxxxxx wrote:
> We define a trivial fallback for atomic_inc_not_zero(), but don't do
> the same for atmic64_inc_not_zero(), leading most architectures to
> define the same boilerplate.

atmic64

> Let's add a fallback in <linux/atomic.h>, and remove the redundant
> implementations. Note that atomic64_add_unless() is always defined in
> <linux/atomic.h>, and promotes its arguments to the requisite types, so
> we need not do this explicitly.
>
> There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h           |  2 --
>  arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h             |  1 -
>  arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h             |  1 -
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h           |  2 --
>  arch/ia64/include/asm/atomic.h            |  2 --
>  arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h            |  2 --
>  arch/parisc/include/asm/atomic.h          |  2 --
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h         |  1 +
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h           |  7 -------
>  arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h            |  1 -
>  arch/sparc/include/asm/atomic_64.h        |  2 --
>  arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_32.h        |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h        |  2 --
>  include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h |  3 +++
>  include/asm-generic/atomic64.h            |  1 -
>  include/linux/atomic.h                    | 11 +++++++++++
>  16 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> [...]
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h
> index 0e27e050ba14..18259e90f57e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h
> @@ -375,13 +375,6 @@ static __always_inline int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u)
>  }
>  #endif
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_ATOMIC64
> -static __always_inline long atomic64_inc_not_zero(atomic64_t *v)
> -{
> -        return atomic64_add_unless(v, 1, 0);
> -}
> -#endif
> -
>  /*
>   * atomic_{cmp,}xchg is required to have exactly the same ordering semantics as
>   * {cmp,}xchg and the operations that return, so they need a full barrier.

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!