Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] mfd: da9063: Add custom IRQ map for DA9063L
From: Lee Jones
Date: Tue Jun 05 2018 - 03:47:38 EST
On Sat, 02 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
> While the datasheet for DA9063L (2v1, 23-Mar-2017) lists the RTC register
> block, the DA9063L does not have an RTC. Add custom IRQ map for DA9063L to
> ignore the Alarm and Tick IRQs from the PMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> V3: New patch
> ---
> drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
> index 5b406ecfc14a..b6a88861cc2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c
> @@ -74,8 +74,55 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip da9063_irq_chip = {
> .init_ack_masked = true,
> };
>
> +static const struct regmap_irq da9063l_irqs[] = {
> + /* DA9063 event A register */
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ONKEY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ONKEY),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_ADC_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_ADC_RDY),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_SEQ_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET, DA9063_M_SEQ_RDY),
> + /* DA9063 event B register */
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_WAKE, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_WAKE),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_TEMP, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_TEMP),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_COMP_1V2, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_COMP_1V2),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_LDO_LIM, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_LDO_LIM),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_REG_UVOV, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_UVOV),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_DVC_RDY, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_DVC_RDY),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_VDD_MON, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_VDD_MON),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_WARN, DA9063_REG_EVENT_B_OFFSET, DA9063_M_VDD_WARN),
> + /* DA9063 event C register */
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI0, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI0),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI1, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI1),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI2, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI2),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI3, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI3),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI4, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI4),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI5, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI5),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI6, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI6),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI7, DA9063_REG_EVENT_C_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI7),
> + /* DA9063 event D register */
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI8, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI8),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI9, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI9),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI10, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI10),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI11, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI11),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI12, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI12),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI13, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI13),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI14, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI14),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(DA9063_IRQ_GPI15, DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET, DA9063_M_GPI15),
> +};
Same here. Please make checkpatch.pl happen, even if it makes the
code slightly less readable.
> +static const struct regmap_irq_chip da9063l_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "da9063l-irq",
> + .irqs = da9063l_irqs,
> + .num_irqs = DA9063_NUM_IRQ,
> +
Nit: This '\n' is superfluous.
> + .num_regs = 4,
> + .status_base = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A,
> + .mask_base = DA9063_REG_IRQ_MASK_A,
> + .ack_base = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A,
> + .init_ack_masked = true,
> +};
> +
> int da9063_irq_init(struct da9063 *da9063)
> {
> + struct regmap_irq_chip *irq_chip;
> int ret;
>
> if (!da9063->chip_irq) {
> @@ -83,10 +130,14 @@ int da9063_irq_init(struct da9063 *da9063)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (da9063->type == PMIC_TYPE_DA9063)
> + irq_chip = &da9063_irq_chip;
> + else
> + irq_chip = &da9063l_irq_chip;
> +
> ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(da9063->regmap, da9063->chip_irq,
> IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
> - da9063->irq_base, &da9063_irq_chip,
> - &da9063->regmap_irq);
> + da9063->irq_base, irq_chip, &da9063->regmap_irq);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(da9063->dev, "Failed to reguest IRQ %d: %d\n",
> da9063->chip_irq, ret);
--
Lee Jones [æçæ]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog