Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: don't skip memory guarantee calculations
From: Roman Gushchin
Date: Tue Jun 05 2018 - 06:16:38 EST
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:03:49AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 04-06-18 17:23:06, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm happy to discuss any concrete issues/concerns, but I really see
> > no reasons to drop it from the mm tree now and start the discussion
> > from scratch.
>
> I do not think this is ready for the current merge window. Sorry! I
> would really prefer to see the whole thing in one series to have a
> better picture.
Please, provide any specific reason for that. I appreciate your opinion,
but *I think* it's not an argument, seriously.
We've discussed the patchset back to March and I made several iterations
based on the received feedback. Later we had a separate discussion with Greg,
who proposed an alternative solution, which, unfortunately, had some serious
shortcomings. And, as I remember, some time ago we've discussed memory.min
with you.
And now you want to start from scratch without providing any reason.
I find it counter-productive, sorry.
Thanks!