[PATCH][next] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: add allocation failure checking of saved_vals
From: Colin King
Date: Wed Jun 06 2018 - 09:44:01 EST
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Currently saved_vals is being allocated and there is no check for
failed allocation (which is more likely than normal when using
GFP_ATOMIC). Fix this by checking for a failed allocation and
propagating this error return down the the caller chain.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1469841 ("Dereference null return value")
Fixes: 88a1dbdec682 ("pinctrl: pinctrl-single: Add functions to save and restore pinctrl context")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index 9c3c00515aa0..0905ee002041 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1588,8 +1588,11 @@ static int pcs_save_context(struct pcs_device *pcs)
mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE;
- if (!pcs->saved_vals)
+ if (!pcs->saved_vals) {
pcs->saved_vals = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev, pcs->size, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!pcs->saved_vals)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
switch (pcs->width) {
case 64:
@@ -1649,8 +1652,13 @@ static int pinctrl_single_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
if (!pcs)
return -EINVAL;
- if (pcs->flags & PCS_CONTEXT_LOSS_OFF)
- pcs_save_context(pcs);
+ if (pcs->flags & PCS_CONTEXT_LOSS_OFF) {
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = pcs_save_context(pcs);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
return pinctrl_force_sleep(pcs->pctl);
}
--
2.17.0