Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: davinci: Do not assume continuous IRQ numbering

From: Grygorii Strashko
Date: Thu Jun 07 2018 - 15:28:38 EST




On 06/06/2018 04:18 AM, Keerthy wrote:
Currently the driver assumes that the interrupts are continuous
and does platform_get_irq only once and assumes the rest are continuous,
instead call platform_get_irq for all the interrupts and store them
in an array for later use.

Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
---

Tested for GPIO Interrupts on da850-lcdk and keystone-k2g-evm boards.

drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 861f35b..375578c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct davinci_gpio_regs {
#define BINTEN 0x8 /* GPIO Interrupt Per-Bank Enable Register */
#define MAX_LABEL_SIZE 20
+#define MAX_INT_PER_BANK 32
static void __iomem *gpio_base;
static unsigned int offset_array[5] = {0x10, 0x38, 0x60, 0x88, 0xb0};
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ static inline struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *irq2regs(struct irq_data *d)
return g;
}
-static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq);
+static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int *bank_irq);
/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -168,7 +169,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
static int ctrl_num, bank_base;
int gpio, bank, ret = 0;
- unsigned ngpio, nbank, bank_irq;
+ unsigned int ngpio, nbank, nirq;
+ int bank_irq[MAX_INT_PER_BANK], i;
struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips;
struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -197,6 +199,16 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (WARN_ON(ARCH_NR_GPIOS < ngpio))
ngpio = ARCH_NR_GPIOS;
+ /*
+ * If there are unbanked interrupts then the number of
+ * interrupts is equal to number of gpios else all are banked so
+ * number of interrupts is equal to number of banks(each with 16 gpios)
+ */
+ if (pdata->gpio_unbanked)
+ nirq = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
+ else
+ nirq = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 16);
+
nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 32);
chips = devm_kzalloc(dev,
nbank * sizeof(struct davinci_gpio_controller),
@@ -209,10 +221,13 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(gpio_base))
return PTR_ERR(gpio_base);
- bank_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (bank_irq < 0) {
- dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ not populated\n");
- return bank_irq;
+ for (i = 0; i < nirq; i++) {
+ bank_irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+ if (bank_irq[i] < 0) {
+ dev_info(dev, "IRQ not populated, err = %d\n",
+ bank_irq[i]);
+ return bank_irq[i];
+ }
}
snprintf(label, MAX_LABEL_SIZE, "davinci_gpio.%d", ctrl_num++);
@@ -458,7 +473,7 @@ static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
* (dm6446) can be set appropriately for GPIOV33 pins.
*/
-static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
+static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int *bank_irq)
{
unsigned gpio, bank;
int irq;
@@ -492,6 +507,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
dev_err(dev, "Error %ld getting gpio clock\n", PTR_ERR(clk));
return PTR_ERR(clk);
}
+
ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -531,12 +547,12 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, int bank_irq)
if (pdata->gpio_unbanked) {
/* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */
chips->chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked;
- chips->base_irq = bank_irq;
+ chips->base_irq = bank_irq[0];


i think, you need to update gpio_to_irq_unbanked() also, which
probably would require to save array of irqs.


and gpio_irq_type_unbanked()



[...]


--
regards,
-grygorii