RE: [LINUX PATCH v9 1/4] Devicetree: Add pl353 smc controller devicetree binding information

From: Naga Sureshkumar Relli
Date: Fri Jun 08 2018 - 01:20:41 EST


Hi Miquel,

Thanks for the review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miquel Raynal [mailto:miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:12 PM
> To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx; richard@xxxxxx; wmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx; f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx;
> mmayer@xxxxxxxxxxxx; rogerq@xxxxxx; ladis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ada@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> honghui.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> nagasureshkumarrelli@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v9 1/4] Devicetree: Add pl353 smc controller devicetree
> binding information
>
> Hi Naga,
>
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 13:19:39 +0530, Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Add pl353 static memory controller devicetree binding information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> > <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v9:
> > - Addressed commens given by Randy Dunlap and Miquel Raynal
>
> Can you please be more specific in your next changelog? I don't remember what I suggested a
> few months ago :)
Ok, I will update.

>
> > Changes in v8:
> > - None
> > Changes in v7:
> > - Corrected clocks description
> > - prefixed '#' for address and size cells Changes in v6:
> > - None
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Removed timing properties
> > Changes in v4:
> > - none
> > Changes in v3:
> > - none
> > Changes in v2:
> > - modified timing binding info as per onfi timing parameters
> > - add suffix nano second as timing unit
> > - modified the clock names as per the IP spec
> > ---
> > .../bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt | 53
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..551e66b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/pl353-smc.t
> > +++ xt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> > +Device tree bindings for ARM PL353 static memory controller
> > +
> > +PL353 static memory controller supports two kinds of memory
> > +interfaces.i.e NAND and SRAM/NOR interfaces.
> > +The actual devices are instantiated from the child nodes of pl353 smc node.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible : Should be "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1"
>
> I thing Rob prefers:
>
> - compatible: Must be one of:
> * arm, pl353-smc-r2p1
Are you suggesting any other compatibles?
Or just a change from "should be to Must be one of"?
>
> > +- reg : Controller registers map and length.
> > +- clock-names : List of input clock names - "ref_clk", "aper_clk"
> > + (See clock bindings for details).
> > +- clocks : Clock phandles (see clock bindings for details).
> > +- address-cells : Address cells, must be 1.
> > +- size-cells : Size cells. Must be 1.
>
> Please avoid padding, just this is enough:
>
> - something: And another thing.
Ok, I will update it.

>
> > +
> > +Child nodes:
> > + For NAND the "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1" and for NOR the "cfi-flash"
> > +drivers are supported as child nodes.
> > +
> > +Mandatory timing properties for child nodes:
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t0 : Read cycle time(t_rc).
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t1 : Write cycle time(t_wc).
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t2 : re_n assertion delay(t_rea).
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t3 : we_n de-assertion delay(t_wp).
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t4 : Status read time(t_clr)
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t5 : ID read time(t_ar)
> > +- arm,nand-cycle-t6 : busy to re_n(t_rr)
>
> I think this has nothing to do in the DT, you should handle timings from the -
> >setup_data_interface() hook. If you need, you may use different compatibles to distinguish
> different platform data.
>
This controller is applicable only to Zynq platform. No other platform will use this.
Basically pl353-smc.c and pl353-nand.c, both are different drivers.
And this data_interface hook is in nand, and to set this timings if we read it from setup_data_interface(), then
We need to make call from nand to smc driver.
Let me try this.

> > +
> > +for nand partition information please refer the below file
>
> s/nand/NAND/
I will update in next version.

>
> > +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt
> > +
> > +Example:
> > + pl353smcc_0: pl353smcc@e000e000 {
>
> Why not something more explicit with the '-flash-controller' suffix?
Is this ok?
smcc: memory-controller@e000e000 {}

>
> > + compatible = "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1"
> > + clock-names = "memclk", "aclk";
> > + clocks = <&clkc 11>, <&clkc 44>;
> > + reg = <0xe000e000 0x1000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > + ranges;
> > + nand_0: nand@e1000000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1"
>
> NAND chips do not have their own compatible.
As I said above, SMCC controller has two interface(NAND, NOR/SRAM).
So to differentiate which interface is selected, we added the compatible.
The dts node looks below.
smcc: memory-controller@e000e000 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
clock-names = "memclk", "aclk";
clocks = <&clkc 11>, <&clkc 44>;
compatible = "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1";
interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
interrupts = <0 18 4>;
ranges ;
reg = <0xe000e000 0x1000>;
nand0: flash@e1000000 {
compatible = "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1";
reg = <0xe1000000 0x1000000>;
#address-cells = <0x1>;
#size-cells = <0x1>;
};
nor0: flash@e2000000 {
compatible = "cfi-flash";
reg = <0xe2000000 0x2000000>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
};
};
>
> > + reg = <0xe1000000 0x1000000>;
> > + arm,nand-cycle-t0 = <0x4>;
> > + arm,nand-cycle-t1 = <0x4>;
> > + arm,nand-cycle-t2 = <0x1>;
> > + arm,nand-cycle-t3 = <0x2>;
> > + arm,nand-cycle-t4 = <0x2>;
> > + arm,nand-cycle-t5 = <0x2>;
> > + arm,nand-cycle-t6 = <0x4>;
> > + (...)
> > + };
> > + };
>
>
> Thanks,
> MiquÃl

Thanks,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli.