Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] scsi: ufs: Add sysfs support for ufs provision
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sat Jun 09 2018 - 03:25:22 EST
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 04:36:30PM +0530, Sayali Lokhande wrote:
> Add sysfs support to trigger ufs provisioning at runtime.
> Usage : echo <desc_buf> > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/*/
> config_descriptor/ufs_provision
> To check provisioning status:
> cat /sys/bus/platform/drivers/*/config_descriptor/ufs_provision
> 1- > Success (Reboot device to check updated provisioning)
>
> Signed-off-by: Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ufs | 16 ++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-sysfs.c | 25 ++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 2 +
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 5 ++
> 5 files changed, 176 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ufs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ufs
> index 016724e..43419b5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ufs
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ufs
> @@ -883,3 +883,19 @@ Contact: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Description: This entry shows the target state of an UFS UIC link
> for the chosen system power management level.
> The file is read only.
> +
> +What: /sys/bus/platform/drivers/ufshcd/*/config_descriptor/ufs_provision
> +Date: February 2018
> +Contact: Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +Description: This file shows the status of runtime ufs provisioning.
> + This can be used to provision ufs device if bConfigDescrLock is 0.
> + Configuration buffer needs to be written in space separated format
> + specificied as:
> + echo <bNumberLU> <bBootEnable> <bDescrAccessEn> <bInitPowerMode>
> + <bHighPriorityLUN> <bSecureRemovalType> <bInitActiveICCLevel>
> + <wPeriodicRTCUpdate> <bConfigDescrLock> <LUNum> <bLUEnable>
> + <bBootLunID> <size_in_kb> <bDataReliability> <bLUWriteProtect>
> + <bMemoryType> <bLogicalBlockSize> <bProvisioningType>
> + <wContextCapabilities> > ufs_provision
That's crazy big, please use configfs for this if you really want to
"provision" hardware with a new api. That is what configfs was created
for, do not abuse sysfs like this, it is not a "single" value.
thanks,
greg k-h