Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] compiler-gcc.h: add gnu_inline to all inline declarations

[Nick Desaulniers]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:31 PM H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 06/12/18 13:19, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> >
> > Oh, by [0] __GCC_STDC_INLINE__ is indeed actually the correct symbol
> > to check for.  Clang does support that, so nothing to fix there.
> >
> >> By the way, you should check clang against gcc's predefined macros by doing:
> >>
> >> gcc [options] -x c -Wp,-dM -E /dev/null | sort
> >>
> >> Options can change the predefined macros substantially, especially the, -std=, arch and -O options. -x c can be replaced with e.g. -x c++, objective-c, assembler-with-cpp etc.
> >
> > Neat, I'll have to bookmark that incantation.  I can s/gcc/clang/ to
> > get a similar list (which is how I know it supports
> > __GCC_STDC_INLINE__).>
>
> I bet that if you add -fgnu89-inlines then it *does* define
> __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__.

Indeed! I see what you mean about [options] changing the predefined symbol list.

> > Patch now becomes something like:
> >
> > #ifdef __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__
> > #define __gnu_inline __attribute__((gnu_inline))
> > #else
> > #define __gnu_inline
> > #endif
> >
> > #define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline, unused)) notrace
> > __gnu_inline
> > ...
> >
> > Issues with that approach?
> >
>
> s/__GNUC_GNU_INLINE__/__GNUC_STDC_INLINE__/

Oops, sorry, yes good catch.

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers