Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add msm version specific ops and data structures
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Tue Jun 12 2018 - 19:36:35 EST
Quoting Vijay Viswanath (2018-05-29 02:52:39)
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 4050c99..2a66aa0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,24 @@ struct sdhci_msm_offset {
> .core_ddr_config_2 = 0x1bc,
> };
>
> +struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops {
> + u8 (*msm_readb_relaxed)(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 offset);
> + u32 (*msm_readl_relaxed)(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 offset);
> + void (*msm_writeb_relaxed)(u8 val, struct sdhci_host *host, u32 offset);
> + void (*msm_writel_relaxed)(u32 val, struct sdhci_host *host,
> + u32 offset);
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * From V5, register spaces have changed. Wrap this info in a structure
> + * and choose the data_structure based on version info mentioned in DT.
> + */
This is sort of odd. Usually we have a read/write function that swizzles
based on register variants, and that's contained with that function. Now
it's the other way.
> +struct sdhci_msm_variant_info {
> + bool mci_removed;
> + const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops *var_ops;
> + const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset;
> +};
> +
> struct sdhci_msm_host {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> void __iomem *core_mem; /* MSM SDCC mapped address */
> @@ -245,8 +263,45 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
> wait_queue_head_t pwr_irq_wait;
> bool pwr_irq_flag;
> u32 caps_0;
> + bool mci_removed;
> + const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops *var_ops;
> + const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * APIs to read/write to vendor specific registers which were there in the
> + * core_mem region before MCI was removed.
> + */
> +static u32 sdhci_msm_mci_variant_readl_relaxed(struct sdhci_host *host,
> + u32 offset)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> +
> + return readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + offset);
Is core_mem assigned in the new hardware? Maybe that needs to be
'repurposed' for vendor specific registers on v5 and renamed to
something like msm_host::vendor_base or something like that.
> +}
> +
> +static u32 sdhci_msm_v5_variant_readl_relaxed(struct sdhci_host *host,
> + u32 offset)
> +{
> + return readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_msm_mci_variant_writel_relaxed(u32 val,
> + struct sdhci_host *host, u32 offset)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> +
> + writel_relaxed(val, msm_host->core_mem + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static void sdhci_msm_v5_variant_writel_relaxed(u32 val,
> + struct sdhci_host *host, u32 offset)
> +{
> + writel_relaxed(val, host->ioaddr + offset);
> +}
> +
> static unsigned int msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host,
> unsigned int clock)
> {
> @@ -1481,6 +1536,28 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
> pr_debug("%s: supported caps: 0x%08x\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), caps);
> }
>
> +static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops mci_var_ops = {
> + .msm_readl_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_readl_relaxed,
> + .msm_writel_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_writel_relaxed,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops v5_var_ops = {
> + .msm_readl_relaxed = sdhci_msm_v5_variant_readl_relaxed,
> + .msm_writel_relaxed = sdhci_msm_v5_variant_writel_relaxed,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdhci_msm_mci_var = {
> + .mci_removed = 0,
Please use true and false instead of 0 and 1 when the type is bool.
> + .var_ops = &mci_var_ops,
> + .offset = &sdhci_msm_mci_offset,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_info sdhci_msm_v5_var = {
> + .mci_removed = 1,
> + .var_ops = &v5_var_ops,
> + .offset = &sdhci_msm_v5_offset,
> +};