RE: [PATCH] staging: lustre: add error handling for try_module_get

[NeilBrown]

On Wed, Jun 13 2018, David Laight wrote:

> From: Zhouyang Jia
>> Sent: 12 June 2018 05:49
>> 
>> When try_module_get fails, the lack of error-handling code may
>> cause unexpected results.
>> 
>> This patch adds error-handling code after calling try_module_get.
> ...
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd.c
>> @@ -2422,7 +2422,10 @@ ksocknal_base_startup(void)
>> 
>>  	/* flag lists/ptrs/locks initialised */
>>  	ksocknal_data.ksnd_init = SOCKNAL_INIT_DATA;
>> -	try_module_get(THIS_MODULE);
>> +	if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) {
>> +		CERROR("%s: cannot get module\n", __func__);
>> +		goto failed;
>> +	}
>
>
> Can try_module_get(THIS_MODULE) ever fail?

Yes.

> Since you are running code in 'THIS_MODULE' the caller must have a
> reference that can't go away.

Not necessarily, though it does usually work that way.

try_module_get() can fail while the exit function is running, but it is
safe to run code in the module until the exit function completes.
So if the exit function takes a lock, then other code can safely run
code in the module while holding the lock, but not holding a reference
to the module.  If this code calls try_module_get(), it could fail.

That is exactly what is happening here.
ksoclnd_exit() calls lnet_unregister_lnd() which takes
the_lnet.ln_lnd_mutex.

ksocknal_base_startup() is called from ksocknal_startup()
which is the_ksocklnd.lnd_startup and is called, from
lnet_startup_lndni(), with that lock held.

> So try_module_get() just increments the count that is already greater
> than zero.
>
> Similarly module_put(THIS_MODULE) must never be able to release the
> last reference.

It can if a suitable lock is held.

> Any such calls that aren't in error paths after try_module_get() are
> probably buggy.
Being in an error path doesn't make it safe.
module_put(THIS_MODULE) can only be safe if a lock is held which
prevents the exit function from completing.  Some code outside the
module must release the lock.

Having said that, I don't really like this approach.  I much prefer for
the module reference to be taken and put outside of the module - it
seems less error-prone.

NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature