Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] efi/fb: Simplify fixup code to prefer struct resource

From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Wed Jun 13 2018 - 11:42:22 EST


On 18 May 2018 at 16:17, Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Get rid of base and size variables in favor of a struct resource.
> The conditional for checking window can be replaced with
> resource_contains().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> index 46a4484..6daac8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c
> @@ -426,17 +426,20 @@ static void record_efifb_bar_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int idx, u64 offset)
>
> static void efifb_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> - u64 base = screen_info.lfb_base;
> - u64 size = screen_info.lfb_size;
> + struct resource screen_res = {
> + .start = screen_info.lfb_base,
> + .end = screen_info.lfb_base + screen_info.lfb_size - 1,
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> + };
> int i;
>
> if (efifb_pci_dev || screen_info.orig_video_isVGA != VIDEO_TYPE_EFI)
> return;
>
> if (screen_info.capabilities & VIDEO_CAPABILITY_64BIT_BASE)
> - base |= (u64)screen_info.ext_lfb_base << 32;
> + screen_res.start |= (u64)screen_info.ext_lfb_base << 32;
>
> - if (!base)
> + if (!screen_res.start)
> return;
>
> for (i = 0; i <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; i++) {
> @@ -445,8 +448,10 @@ static void efifb_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM))
> continue;
>
> - if (res->start <= base && res->end >= base + size - 1) {
> - record_efifb_bar_resource(dev, i, base - res->start);
> + if (resource_contains(res, &screen_res)) {
> + u64 win_offset = screen_res.start - res->start;
> +
> + record_efifb_bar_resource(dev, i, win_offset);
> break;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel