Re: [PATCH linux-next v5 07/13] dt-bindings: mfd: Add a document for PECI client mfd

From: Jae Hyun Yoo
Date: Thu Jun 14 2018 - 13:25:44 EST


Thanks for the review. Please check my answers inline.

On 6/12/2018 11:16 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
All s/mfd/MFD/


Got it. Will fix it.

This commit adds a dt-bindings document for PECI client multi-function
device.

Multi-Function Device


Will fix it.

Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Feist <james.feist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason M Biils <jason.m.bills@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vernon Mauery <vernon.mauery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/mfd/peci-client.txt | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/peci-client.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/peci-client.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/peci-client.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4eb8f6bb6ca4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/peci-client.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+* Intel PECI client bindings

Now it the time to expand on what a "PECI client" is.


Okay, I'll add more description about the "PECI client".

+Required properties:
+- compatible : Should be "intel,peci-client", "simple-mfd".
+- reg : Should contain address of a client CPU. Address range of CPU
+ clients is starting from 0x30 based on PECI specification.

s/is starting/start/


Will change it to "Address range of CPU clients starts from ...".

+Example:
+ peci-bus@0 {

0?


Because the actual reg value of the peci bus is reg = <0x0 0x60> but
anyway it's an example.

+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;

No 'reg' property?


This is the actual peci bus node which is a parent of this MFD node:
peci0: peci-bus@0 {
compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-peci";
reg = <0x0 0x60>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
interrupts = <15>;
clocks = <&syscon ASPEED_CLK_GATE_REFCLK>;
resets = <&syscon ASPEED_RESET_PECI>;
clock-frequency = <24000000>;
msg-timing = <1>;
addr-timing = <1>;
rd-sampling-point = <8>;
cmd-timeout-ms = <1000>;
};

+ < more properties >

Remove this.


I dropped all other properties into < more properties > because I want
to show the #address-cells and #size-cells to state its sub-nodes
should have a single unique reg value. Should I remove this line or the
whole parent node?

+ peci-client@30 {
+ compatible = "intel,peci-client", "simple-mfd";
+ reg = <0x30>;
+ };
+
+ peci-client@31 {
+ compatible = "intel,peci-client", "simple-mfd";
+ reg = <0x31>;
+ };
+ };