Re: [PATCHv3 07/17] x86/mm: Preserve KeyID on pte_modify() and pgprot_modify()
From: Kirill A. Shutemov
Date: Fri Jun 15 2018 - 16:45:22 EST
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 04:58:24PM +0000, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 06/15/2018 09:06 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > I have no idea what such concept should be called. I cannot come with
> > anything better than PTE_PFN_MASK_MAX. Do you?
>
> PTE_PRESERVE_MASK
>
> Or maybe:
>
> PTE_MODIFY_PRESERVE_MASK
It just replacing one confusion with another. Preserve what? How does it
differ from _PAGE_CHG_MASK?
I frankly think my name proposal convey more meaning.
> Maybe a comment to go along with it:
>
> /*
> * These are the bits that must be preserved during when doing a
> * PTE permission modification operation, like taking a PTE from
> * R/W->R/O. They include the physical address and the memory
> * encryption keyID. The paddr and the keyID never occupy the same
> * bits at the same time. But, a given bit might be used for the keyID
> * on one system and used for the physical address on another. As an
> * optimization, we manage them in one unit here since their combination
> * always occupies the same hardware bits.
> */
Thanks, this is useful.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov