[PATCH 4.14 148/189] ocfs2: take inode cluster lock before moving reflinked inode from orphan dir

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit e4383029201470523c3ffe339bd7d57e9b4a7d65 ]

While reflinking an inode, we create a new inode in orphan directory,
then take EX lock on it, reflink the original inode to orphan inode and
release EX lock.  Once the lock is released another node could request
it in EX mode from ocfs2_recover_orphans() which causes downconvert of
the lock, on this node, to NL mode.

Later we attempt to initialize security acl for the orphan inode and
move it to the reflink destination.  However, while doing this we dont
take EX lock on the inode.  This could potentially cause problems
because we could be starting transaction, accessing journal and
modifying metadata of the inode while holding NL lock and with another
node holding EX lock on the inode.

Fix this by taking orphan inode cluster lock in EX mode before
initializing security and moving orphan inode to reflink destination.
Use the __tracker variant while taking inode lock to avoid recursive
locking in the ocfs2_init_security_and_acl() call chain.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1523475107-7639-1-git-send-email-ashish.samant@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c
@@ -4250,10 +4250,11 @@ out:
 static int ocfs2_reflink(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir,
 			 struct dentry *new_dentry, bool preserve)
 {
-	int error;
+	int error, had_lock;
 	struct inode *inode = d_inode(old_dentry);
 	struct buffer_head *old_bh = NULL;
 	struct inode *new_orphan_inode = NULL;
+	struct ocfs2_lock_holder oh;
 
 	if (!ocfs2_refcount_tree(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb)))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -4295,6 +4296,14 @@ static int ocfs2_reflink(struct dentry *
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	had_lock = ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker(new_orphan_inode, NULL, 1,
+					    &oh);
+	if (had_lock < 0) {
+		error = had_lock;
+		mlog_errno(error);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	/* If the security isn't preserved, we need to re-initialize them. */
 	if (!preserve) {
 		error = ocfs2_init_security_and_acl(dir, new_orphan_inode,
@@ -4302,14 +4311,15 @@ static int ocfs2_reflink(struct dentry *
 		if (error)
 			mlog_errno(error);
 	}
-out:
 	if (!error) {
 		error = ocfs2_mv_orphaned_inode_to_new(dir, new_orphan_inode,
 						       new_dentry);
 		if (error)
 			mlog_errno(error);
 	}
+	ocfs2_inode_unlock_tracker(new_orphan_inode, 1, &oh, had_lock);
 
+out:
 	if (new_orphan_inode) {
 		/*
 		 * We need to open_unlock the inode no matter whether we