Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Change to ktime_get_ts64()

From: Corey Minyard
Date: Mon Jun 18 2018 - 13:39:16 EST


On 06/18/2018 09:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
getnstimeofday64() is deprecated because of the inconsistent naming,
it is only a wrapper around ktime_get_real_ts64() now, which could be
used as a direct replacement.

However, it is generally better to use CLOCK_MONOTONIC timestamps
where possible, to avoid glitches with a concurrent settimeofday()
or leap second.

The uses in ipmi are either for debugging prints or for comparing against
a prior timestamp, so using a monotonic ktime_get_ts64() is probably
best here.

This is definitely better. Queued for 4.19 (or whatever it will be called).

Thanks,

-corey

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
index ad353be871bf..fb19c796f0fa 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ void debug_timestamp(char *msg)
{
struct timespec64 t;
- getnstimeofday64(&t);
+ ktime_get_ts64(&t);
pr_debug("**%s: %lld.%9.9ld\n", msg, (long long) t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec);
}
#else
@@ -961,12 +961,12 @@ static inline int ipmi_thread_busy_wait(enum si_sm_result smi_result,
if (max_busy_us == 0 || smi_result != SI_SM_CALL_WITH_DELAY)
ipmi_si_set_not_busy(busy_until);
else if (!ipmi_si_is_busy(busy_until)) {
- getnstimeofday64(busy_until);
+ ktime_get_ts64(busy_until);
timespec64_add_ns(busy_until, max_busy_us*NSEC_PER_USEC);
} else {
struct timespec64 now;
- getnstimeofday64(&now);
+ ktime_get_ts64(&now);
if (unlikely(timespec64_compare(&now, busy_until) > 0)) {
ipmi_si_set_not_busy(busy_until);
return 0;