Re: [PATCHv3 00/18] atomics: API cleanups

From: Mark Rutland
Date: Tue Jun 19 2018 - 06:39:02 EST


On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:20:49AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 11:18:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:21:27PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:19:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > > This series contains a few cleanups of the atomic API, fixing
> > > > > inconsistencies between atomic_* and atomic64_*, and minimizing
> > > > > repetition in arch code. This is nicer for arch code, and the improved
> > > > > regularity will help when generating the atomic headers in future.
> > > >
> > > > Apart from the Alpha patch:
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Cheers! I assume that also holds with patch 7 fixes up to use s64.
> >
> > I've pushed out the series with those fixes and your Reviewed-by tags.
> >
> > Given the whole series has your Reviewed-By and Peter's Acked-by, I
> > assume that you're both happy for this to be queued?
> >
> > What's your prefered way for that to happen? Should I send a v4 with
> > those fixes, a pull request, or are you happy to fetch that in a little
> > while regardless?
>
> Probably best to send a v4, then Ingo can take it all via -tip.

Ok.

> Before you do that, can you also spell-check your commit messages
> please? I spotted a bunch of silly typos, and it will save Ingo from
> having to fix them up if you do it first.

Sorry about that. I've gone through those now, and fixed what I have
spotted. I'll give it another pass before I post v4, just in case. :)

Thanks,
Mark.