Re: [PATCH] tee: replace getnstimeofday64() with ktime_get_real_ts64()
From: Jens Wiklander
Date: Tue Jun 19 2018 - 10:23:13 EST
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Jens Wiklander
> <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 04:24:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> The two do the same thing, but we want to have a consistent
> >> naming in the kernel.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> >> index 41aea12e2bcc..b45c73dd37a5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> >> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_get_time(struct optee_msg_arg *arg)
> >> OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT)
> >> goto bad;
> >>
> >> - getnstimeofday64(&ts);
> >> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts);
> >> arg->params[0].u.value.a = ts.tv_sec;
> >> arg->params[0].u.value.b = ts.tv_nsec;
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.9.0
> >>
> >
> > Looks good.
> >
> > Acked-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for the review. Can you pick it up in your tree?
OK, I'll pick it up.
Thanks,
Jens