Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/21] 3.18.113-stable review

[Guenter Roeck]

On 06/19/2018 05:36 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 05:09:11PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:08:12PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> > > > > stable-rc/linux-3.18.y boot: 52 boots: 28 failed, 18 passed with 1 offline, 5 conflicts (v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9)
> > > > >
> > > > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9/
> > > > > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9/
> > > > >
> > > > > Tree: stable-rc
> > > > > Branch: linux-3.18.y
> > > > > Git Describe: v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9
> > > > > Git Commit: b0582263e3c9810fd887ca92d19cb9ff30a4d9f6
> > > > > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > > > > Tested: 24 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 13 builds out of 183
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > That is a lot of new failures, did the whole lab fail, or is this really
> > > > a problem in v3.18.112 here?
> > >
> > > Whole lab failure (more precisely, lab operator failure)  ;)
> > >
> > > gak, I updated the rootfs images to the latest buildroot, which forced
> > > me to upgrade the kernel headers used to build the rootfs from v3.10 to
> > > v4.4.  So I guess it's no surprise that every single board panic'd as
> > > soon as it hit userspace.
> > I build my root file systems with buildroot, and had a similar problem. My fix
> > was to patch buildroot to let me use older linux headers.
>
> Could you share the patch?

Try git@xxxxxxxxxx:groeck/buildroot.git branch local-2018.05.

Guenter