Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add TRACE_EVENTs in pwc_isoc_handler()

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:05:51 +0300
"Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> > If that can work for you, I'm fine with that. Trace events may be
> > cheap, but they do come with some cost. I'd like to have all trace
> > events be as valuable as possible, and limit the "special case" ones.  
> 
> What is the cost for events? I suppose one conditional check when
> trace is disabled? There is already similar debugging stuff related to
> usbmon in __usb_hcd_giveback_urb(), so I don't think that another
> conditional check will hurt performance dramatically there. When
> discussing second patch in this series I see that the issue that it is
> intended to resolve may be common to other USB media drivers.

The cost isn't just about performance. In fact, the performance
overhead of trace events is pretty negligible. The cost I'm worried
about is bloat. Each event can take up to 5K of memory. That can add up
quickly when we add a bunch of events without thinking about that cost.

-- Steve