Re: [PATCH 3/7] x86,tlb: change tlbstate.is_lazy to tlbstate.state

[Rik van Riel]

On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 10:01 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 06/20/2018 12:56 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > +#define TLBSTATE_OK	0
> > +#define TLBSTATE_LAZY	1
> 
> Could we spell out a bit more about what "OK" means in comments?  It
> obviously means "not lazy", but anything else?

After discussion with Andy, I plan to simply drop
this patch, and use memory ordering between updating
tlbstate.is_lazy and *.tlb_gen to take care of getting
the TLB reloaded at context switch time if needed.

We should not need the extra TLBSTATE_FLUSH state,
so a boolean is fine and this patch is unnecessary.

-- 
All Rights Reversed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part