Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] x86/tsc: prepare for early sched_clock
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Sat Jun 23 2018 - 12:51:19 EST
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> We will change sched_clock() to be called early.
Why is this relevant? Does the issue only appear with that change?
> But, during boot sched_clock() changes its output without notifying us
> about the change of clock source.
Why would the sched clock change notify _US_?
Can you please try to write your changelog in factual technical terms
without impersonating the system/code?
> This happens in tsc_init(), when static_branch_enable(&__use_tsc) is
> called.
>
> native_sched_clock() changes from outputing jiffies to reading tsc, but
> sched is not notified in anyway. So, to preserve the continoutity in this
sched? -EMAKESNOSENSE
There is no notification mechanism and it's not required.
> place we add the offset of sched_clock() to the calculation of cyc2ns.
s/we//
See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy to
do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change its
behaviour.
> Without this change, the output would look like this:
Would? It looks exactly like this or why would you try to fix it?
>
> [ 0.004000] ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
> [ 0.009000] tsc: Fast TSC calibration using PIT
> [ 0.010000] tsc: Detected 3192.137 MHz processor
> [ 0.011000] clocksource: tsc-early: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x2e03465ceb2, max_idle_ns: 440795259855 ns
>
> static_branch_enable(__use_tsc) is called, and timestamps became precise
> but reduced:
>
> [ 0.002233] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 6384.27 BogoMIPS (lpj=3192137)
> [ 0.002516] pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301
Let me give you an example:
When tsc_init() enables the usage of TSC for sched_clock() the
initialization of the tsc sched clock conversion data starts from zero
and not from the current jiffies based sched_clock() value. This makes
the timestamps jump backwards:
[ 0.010000] tsc: Detected 3192.137 MHz processor
[ 0.011000] clocksource: tsc-early: mask: ...
[ 0.002233] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), ....
To address this, extend set_cyc2ns_scale() with an argument to base the
cyc2ns offset on the current sched_clock() value. During run time this
offset is 0 as the cyc2ns offset is based on the TSC sched_clock()
itself.
See? Precise and pure technical. No we/us/would/ and no irrelevant
information.
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index 186395041725..654a01cc0358 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,9 @@ static inline unsigned long long cycles_2_ns(unsigned long long cyc)
> return ns;
> }
>
> -static void set_cyc2ns_scale(unsigned long khz, int cpu, unsigned long long tsc_now)
> +static void set_cyc2ns_scale(unsigned long khz, int cpu,
> + unsigned long long tsc_now,
> + unsigned long long sched_now)
sched_now is not a real good name for this as it's only used at
initialization time. So the argument name should reflect this otherwise you
wonder yourself when looking at that code 6 month from now, why it's 0 on
all the run time call sites. init_offset or some other sensible name which
makes the purpose entirely clear.
> void __init tsc_init(void)
> {
> - u64 lpj, cyc;
> + u64 lpj, cyc, sch;
sch? what's wrong with sched_now or now? It's not that there is a 3 letter
limit.
> int cpu;
>
> if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
> @@ -1403,9 +1405,10 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
> * up if their speed diverges)
> */
> cyc = rdtsc();
> + sch = local_clock();
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> cyc2ns_init(cpu);
> - set_cyc2ns_scale(tsc_khz, cpu, cyc);
> + set_cyc2ns_scale(tsc_khz, cpu, cyc, sch);
> }
Thanks,
tglx