Icenowy Zheng writes:
>å 2018-03-15åç 16:25 +0000ïHarald Geyeråéï
> >+&mmc1 {
> >+ pinctrl-names = "default";
> >+ pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>;
> >+ vmmc-supply = <®_aldo2>;
> >+ vqmmc-supply = <®_dldo4>;
> >+ mmc-pwrseq = <&wifi_pwrseq>;
> >+ bus-width = <4>;
> >+ non-removable;
> >+ status = "okay";
> >+
> >+ rtl8723bs: wifi@1 {
> >+ reg = <1>;
> >+ interrupt-parent = <&r_pio>;
> >+ interrupts = <0 3 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; /* PL3 */
> >+ interrupt-names = "host-wake";
> >+ };
>- This device node has no binding. The "host-wake" interrupt is part ofI think the general mmc and interrupts bindings apply. And the mmc binding
> Broadcom SDIO Wi-Fi binding, rather than a generic one.
clearly states that for sub-nodes a compatible string is optional.
However I just realized that the 'interrupt-names' property is not part
of the general interrupts binding, so I guess at least this property should
be removed.