Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 2/2] mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem for large mapping
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Mon Jun 25 2018 - 05:15:05 EST
On Fri 22-06-18 18:01:08, Yang Shi wrote:
> Yes, this is true but I guess what Yang Shi meant was that an userspace
> > > access racing with munmap is not well defined. You never know whether
> > > you get your data, #PTF or SEGV because it depends on timing. The user
> > > visible change might be that you lose content and get zero page instead
> > > if you hit the race window while we are unmapping which was not possible
> > > before. But whouldn't such an access pattern be buggy anyway? You need
> > > some form of external synchronization AFAICS.
> > >
> > > But maybe some userspace depends on "getting right data or get SEGV"
> > > semantic. If we have to preserve that then we can come up with a VM_DEAD
> > > flag set before we tear it down and force the SEGV on the #PF path.
> > > Something similar we already do for MMF_UNSTABLE.
> >
> > Set VM_DEAD with read mmap_sem held? It should be ok since this is the
> > only place to set this flag for this unique special case.
>
> BTW, it looks the vm flags have used up in 32 bit. If we really need
> VM_DEAD, it should be for both 32-bit and 64-bit.
Do we really need any special handling for 32b? Who is going to create
GB mappings for all this to be worth doing?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs