[PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/40] rcu: Convert grace-period requests to ->gp_seq
From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Mon Jun 25 2018 - 20:13:22 EST
This commit converts the grace-period request code paths from ->completed
and ->gpnum to ->gp_seq. The need_future_gp_element() macro encapsulates
the shift operation required to use ->gp_seq as an index to the
->need_future_gp[] array. The rcu_cbs_completed() function is removed
in favor of the rcu_seq_snap() function. The rcu_start_this_gp()
gets some temporary consistency checks and uses rcu_seq_done(),
rcu_seq_current(), rcu_seq_state(), and rcu_gp_in_progress() in place
of the earlier open-coded comparisons of ->gpnum and ->completed.
The rcu_future_gp_cleanup() function replaces use of ->completed
with ->gp_seq. The rcu_accelerate_cbs() function replaces a call to
rcu_cbs_completed() with one to rcu_seq_snap(). The rcu_advance_cbs()
function replaces an access to >completed with one to ->gp_seq and adds
some temporary warnings. The rcu_nocb_wait_gp() function replaces a
call to rcu_cbs_completed() with one to rcu_seq_snap() and an open-coded
comparison with rcu_seq_done().
The temporary warnings will be removed when the various ->gpnum and
->completed fields are removed. Their purpose is to locate code who
might still be using ->gpnum and ->completed. (Much easier that way
than trying to trace down the causes of too-short grace periods and
grace-period hangs!)
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 84 ++++++++++------------------------------
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 6 +--
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 85d14ae49ffc..6f9a564e82d3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1548,52 +1548,6 @@ void rcu_cpu_stall_reset(void)
WRITE_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_stall, jiffies + ULONG_MAX / 2);
}
-/*
- * Determine the value that ->completed will have at the end of the
- * next subsequent grace period. This is used to tag callbacks so that
- * a CPU can invoke callbacks in a timely fashion even if that CPU has
- * been dyntick-idle for an extended period with callbacks under the
- * influence of RCU_FAST_NO_HZ.
- *
- * The caller must hold rnp->lock with interrupts disabled.
- */
-static unsigned long rcu_cbs_completed(struct rcu_state *rsp,
- struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
- raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
-
- /*
- * If RCU is idle, we just wait for the next grace period.
- * But we can only be sure that RCU is idle if we are looking
- * at the root rcu_node structure -- otherwise, a new grace
- * period might have started, but just not yet gotten around
- * to initializing the current non-root rcu_node structure.
- */
- if (rcu_get_root(rsp) == rnp && rnp->gpnum == rnp->completed)
- return rnp->completed + 1;
-
- /*
- * If the current rcu_node structure believes that RCU is
- * idle, and if the rcu_state structure does not yet reflect
- * the start of a new grace period, then the next grace period
- * will suffice. The memory barrier is needed to accurately
- * sample the rsp->gpnum, and pairs with the second lock
- * acquisition in rcu_gp_init(), which is augmented with
- * smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() for this purpose.
- */
- if (rnp->gpnum == rnp->completed) {
- smp_mb(); /* See above block comment. */
- if (READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum) == rnp->completed)
- return rnp->completed + 1;
- }
-
- /*
- * Otherwise, wait for a possible partial grace period and
- * then the subsequent full grace period.
- */
- return rnp->completed + 2;
-}
-
/* Trace-event wrapper function for trace_rcu_future_grace_period. */
static void trace_rcu_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
unsigned long c, const char *s)
@@ -1629,16 +1583,16 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
* not be released.
*/
raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(c & 0x2); /* Catch any lingering use of ->gpnum. */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(((rnp->completed << RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT) >> RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT) != rcu_seq_ctr(rnp->gp_seq)); /* Catch any ->completed/->gp_seq mismatches. */
trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("Startleaf"));
for (rnp_root = rnp; 1; rnp_root = rnp_root->parent) {
if (rnp_root != rnp)
raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(ULONG_CMP_LT(rnp_root->gpnum +
- need_future_gp_mask(), c));
if (need_future_gp_element(rnp_root, c) ||
- ULONG_CMP_GE(rnp_root->gpnum, c) ||
+ rcu_seq_done(&rnp_root->gp_seq, c) ||
(rnp != rnp_root &&
- rnp_root->gpnum != rnp_root->completed)) {
+ rcu_seq_state(rcu_seq_current(&rnp_root->gp_seq)))) {
trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_root, rdp, c, TPS("Prestarted"));
goto unlock_out;
}
@@ -1650,7 +1604,7 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
}
/* If GP already in progress, just leave, otherwise start one. */
- if (rnp_root->gpnum != rnp_root->completed) {
+ if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp_root, rdp, c, TPS("Startedleafroot"));
goto unlock_out;
}
@@ -1675,7 +1629,7 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
*/
static bool rcu_future_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
- unsigned long c = rnp->completed;
+ unsigned long c = rnp->gp_seq;
bool needmore;
struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
@@ -1703,14 +1657,14 @@ static void rcu_gp_kthread_wake(struct rcu_state *rsp)
}
/*
- * If there is room, assign a ->completed number to any callbacks on
- * this CPU that have not already been assigned. Also accelerate any
- * callbacks that were previously assigned a ->completed number that has
- * since proven to be too conservative, which can happen if callbacks get
- * assigned a ->completed number while RCU is idle, but with reference to
- * a non-root rcu_node structure. This function is idempotent, so it does
- * not hurt to call it repeatedly. Returns an flag saying that we should
- * awaken the RCU grace-period kthread.
+ * If there is room, assign a ->gp_seq number to any callbacks on this
+ * CPU that have not already been assigned. Also accelerate any callbacks
+ * that were previously assigned a ->gp_seq number that has since proven
+ * to be too conservative, which can happen if callbacks get assigned a
+ * ->gp_seq number while RCU is idle, but with reference to a non-root
+ * rcu_node structure. This function is idempotent, so it does not hurt
+ * to call it repeatedly. Returns an flag saying that we should awaken
+ * the RCU grace-period kthread.
*
* The caller must hold rnp->lock with interrupts disabled.
*/
@@ -1736,7 +1690,7 @@ static bool rcu_accelerate_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
* accelerating callback invocation to an earlier grace-period
* number.
*/
- c = rcu_cbs_completed(rsp, rnp);
+ c = rcu_seq_snap(&rsp->gp_seq);
if (rcu_segcblist_accelerate(&rdp->cblist, c))
ret = rcu_start_this_gp(rnp, rdp, c);
@@ -1751,7 +1705,7 @@ static bool rcu_accelerate_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
/*
* Move any callbacks whose grace period has completed to the
* RCU_DONE_TAIL sublist, then compact the remaining sublists and
- * assign ->completed numbers to any callbacks in the RCU_NEXT_TAIL
+ * assign ->gp_seq numbers to any callbacks in the RCU_NEXT_TAIL
* sublist. This function is idempotent, so it does not hurt to
* invoke it repeatedly. As long as it is not invoked -too- often...
* Returns true if the RCU grace-period kthread needs to be awakened.
@@ -1768,10 +1722,10 @@ static bool rcu_advance_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
return false;
/*
- * Find all callbacks whose ->completed numbers indicate that they
+ * Find all callbacks whose ->gp_seq numbers indicate that they
* are ready to invoke, and put them into the RCU_DONE_TAIL sublist.
*/
- rcu_segcblist_advance(&rdp->cblist, rnp->completed);
+ rcu_segcblist_advance(&rdp->cblist, rnp->gp_seq);
/* Classify any remaining callbacks. */
return rcu_accelerate_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp);
@@ -1889,6 +1843,8 @@ static bool rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
smp_store_release(&rsp->gpnum, rsp->gpnum + 1);
smp_mb(); /* Pairs with barriers in stall-warning code. */
rcu_seq_start(&rsp->gp_seq);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(((rnp->completed << RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT) >> RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT) != rcu_seq_ctr(rnp->gp_seq))) /* Catch any ->completed/->gp_seq mismatches. */
+ pr_info("%s ->completed: %#lx (%#lx) ->gp_seq %#lx (%#lx)\n", __func__, rnp->completed, (rnp->completed << RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT) >> RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT, rnp->gp_seq, rcu_seq_ctr(rnp->gp_seq));
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->gpnum, TPS("start"));
raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 6d6cbc8b3a9c..a21d403a6010 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ struct rcu_node {
#define need_future_gp_mask() \
(ARRAY_SIZE(((struct rcu_node *)NULL)->need_future_gp) - 1)
#define need_future_gp_element(rnp, c) \
- ((rnp)->need_future_gp[(c) & need_future_gp_mask()])
+ ((rnp)->need_future_gp[(c >> RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT) & need_future_gp_mask()])
#define need_any_future_gp(rnp) \
({ \
int __i; \
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 2a81d243521f..2036dc7426ac 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2105,7 +2105,7 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
- c = rcu_cbs_completed(rdp->rsp, rnp);
+ c = rcu_seq_snap(&rdp->rsp->gp_seq);
needwake = rcu_start_this_gp(rnp, rdp, c);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
if (needwake)
@@ -2118,8 +2118,8 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, c, TPS("StartWait"));
for (;;) {
swait_event_interruptible(
- rnp->nocb_gp_wq[c & 0x1],
- (d = ULONG_CMP_GE(READ_ONCE(rnp->completed), c)));
+ rnp->nocb_gp_wq[rcu_seq_ctr(c) & 0x1],
+ (d = rcu_seq_done(&rnp->gp_seq, c)));
if (likely(d))
break;
WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
--
2.17.1