Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver

[David Collins]

Hello Mark,

On 06/28/2018 03:18 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 09:28:03AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> 
>> OK, great.  I guess I'm confused about the "|| COMPILE_TEST" causing
>> problems then?  I was worried that anyone trying to do "COMPILE_TEST"
>> on your tree (or linuxnext if RPMh isn't there) would get failures due
>> to the lack of header files.  I guess if it's a problem you could just
>> gut the "|| COMPILE_TEST" and it could be added back in later?
> 
> Ugh, yes - that'll break things.  In that case I can't apply this
> without a signed tag from Andy's tree with the dependency stuff in.
> 

Do you have any remaining concerns with the qcom-rpmh-regulator binding
and driver patches that would keep you from applying them (other than the
dependency patches being applied first)?

Thanks,
David

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project