Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.18 1/2] rseq: validate rseq_cs fields are < TASK_SIZE
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Thu Jun 28 2018 - 16:23:07 EST
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Validating the abort_ip field of rseq_cs ensures that the kernel don't
> return to an invalid address when returning to userspace after an abort.
> I don't fully trust each architecture code to cleanly deal with invalid
> return addresses.
>
> Validating the range [ start_ip, start_ip + post_commit_offset ] is an
> extra validation step ensuring that userspace provides valid values to
> describe the critical section.
>
> If validation fails, the process is killed with a segmentation fault.
>
> Change the rseq ABI so rseq_cs start_ip, post_commit_offset and abort_ip
> fields are seen as 64-bit fields by both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels rather
> that ignoring the 32 upper bits on 32-bit kernels. This ensures we have
> a consistent behavior for a 32-bit binary executed on 32-bit kernels and
> in compat mode on 64-bit kernels.
This is okay with me for a fix outside the merge window. Can you do a
followup for the next merge window that fixes it better, though? In
particular, TASK_SIZE is generally garbage. I think a better fix
would be something like adding a new arch-overridable helper like:
static inline unsigned long current_max_user_addr(void) { return TASK_SIZE; }
and overriding it on x86 as something like:
static inline unsigned long current_max_user_addr(void) {
#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
return user_64bit_mode(current_pt_regs()) ? TASK_SIZE_MAX : (1UL << 32) - 1;
#else
return TASK_SIZE_MAX;
}
TASK_SIZE really needs to die.