Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] Documentation: DT: Consolidate SP805 binding docs

[Guenter Roeck]

On 06/28/2018 04:50 PM, Ray Jui wrote:
> Hi Guenter/Florian,
>
> On 6/27/2018 11:55 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
> > > On 6/27/2018 11:42 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:38:48AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
> > > > > On 6/27/2018 11:33 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Guenter/Rob,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kindly let me know how you want to proceed with this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I recall correctly, the patch series does not add a new problem
> > > > > > but merely exposes one. Is my recollection correct ? If so, maybe
> > > > > > we should just add a note somewhere indicating what might be wrong
> > > > > > and otherwise apply the series.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does this make sense ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes this makes a lot of sense to me. This patch series exposes potential
> > > > > problems in some SoCs that they might not be feeding the correct clock into
> > > > > WDT, at least based on clock names from their DT entries.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch series does not change/affect how SP805 works on those systems.
> > > > >
> > > > > Where should the note be added?
> > > >
> > > > I would suggest to add a note into the driver where the clock is used,
> > > > with the details discussed here.
> > >
> > > I assume you meant adding the notes to the SP805 driver where the clock is
> > > used.
> > >
> > > If so, I think that makes sense. That notes deserves its own patch because
> > > it really has nothing to do with any of the change in this patch series.
> > >
> > > Do you want me to 1) embed that patch into this patch series and send out
> > > v5; or 2) leave the patch series as it is and send out a separate patch to
> > > add the notes to the driver?
> > 2) is fine. I don't have the series here right now; if I recall correctly
> > all patches in the series are all marked as Reviewed-by: and/or Acked-by:.
> > If so, I'll apply them to my tree tonight, or at least the ones that will
> > go in through the watchdog tree.
> >
> > Guenter
>
> Guenter, please let us know once you take the first 4 patches.

Patches are in my tree. Wim, it would be great if you can pick up the tree
so it shows up in -next.

Thanks,
Guenter

> Florian, could you please help with the last 2, once Guenter confirmed the first 4 are merged.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ray
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html