Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: r8a66597: Fix two possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in init_controller()
From: Robert Jarzmik
Date: Fri Jun 29 2018 - 02:49:03 EST
Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> The driver may sleep with holding a spinlock.
>>> The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16.7 are:
>>>
>>> [FUNC] msleep
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c, 839:
>>> msleep in init_controller
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c, 96:
>>> init_controller in r8a66597_usb_disconnect
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/r8a66597-udc.c, 93:
>>> spin_lock in r8a66597_usb_disconnect
>>
>> That should not happen...
>>
>> If think the issue you have is that your usb_connect() and usb_disconnect() are
>> called from interrupt context. I think the proper fix, as what is done in most
>> udc phys, is to schedule a workqueue, see drivers/usb/phy/phy-gpio-vbus-usb.c,
>> gpio_vbus_data.vbus.
>
> argh, no. No workqueues needed here. Sorry
Technically why ?
And as bonus question, why is it better to have mdelay() calls in the driver ?
Cheers.
--
Robert