[PATCH 3.18 64/85] mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Use right chip in do_ppb_xxlock()

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sun Jul 01 2018 - 14:42:23 EST


3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit f93aa8c4de307069c270b2d81741961162bead6c upstream.

do_ppb_xxlock() fails to add chip->start when querying for lock status
(and chip_ready test), which caused false status reports.
Fix that by adding adr += chip->start and adjust call sites
accordingly.

Fixes: 1648eaaa1575 ("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Support Persistent Protection Bits (PPB) locking")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
@@ -2551,8 +2551,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused do_ppb_xxlock(
unsigned long timeo;
int ret;

+ adr += chip->start;
mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
- ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr + chip->start, FL_LOCKING);
+ ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr, FL_LOCKING);
if (ret) {
mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
return ret;
@@ -2570,8 +2571,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused do_ppb_xxlock(

if (thunk == DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK) {
chip->state = FL_LOCKING;
- map_write(map, CMD(0xA0), chip->start + adr);
- map_write(map, CMD(0x00), chip->start + adr);
+ map_write(map, CMD(0xA0), adr);
+ map_write(map, CMD(0x00), adr);
} else if (thunk == DO_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK) {
/*
* Unlocking of one specific sector is not supported, so we
@@ -2609,7 +2610,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused do_ppb_xxlock(
map_write(map, CMD(0x00), chip->start);

chip->state = FL_READY;
- put_chip(map, chip, adr + chip->start);
+ put_chip(map, chip, adr);
mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);

return ret;