Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: am33xx: Add pinmux data for mmc1 in am335x-evm, evmsk and beaglebone

From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Mon Jul 02 2018 - 06:50:45 EST


* Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@xxxxxxxxx> [180618 14:00]:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > am335x-evm, am335x-evmsk and am335x-beaglebone are currently relying on
> > pinmux set by the bootloader to set the correct value for mmc1. Fix
> > this by adding pinmux data for the same in kernel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi | 9 ++++++++-
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-evm.dts | 9 ++++++++-
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-evmsk.dts | 9 ++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi
> > index e67b4d6..f9e8667 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi
> > @@ -161,7 +161,14 @@
> >
> > mmc1_pins: pinmux_mmc1_pins {
> > pinctrl-single,pins = <
> > - AM33XX_IOPAD(0x960, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE7) /* GPIO0_6 */
> > + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x960, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE7) /* spio0_cs1.gpio0_6 */
> > + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x8fc, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_dat0.mmc0_dat0 */
> > + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x8f8, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_dat1.mmc0_dat1 */
> > + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x8f4, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_dat2.mmc0_dat2 */
> > + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x8f0, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_dat3.mmc0_dat3 */
> > + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x904, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_cmd.mmc0_cmd */
> > + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x900, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_clk.mmc0_clk */
> > + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x9a0, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE4) /* mcasp0_aclkr.mmc0_sdwp */
>
> We went one pin too far on the Beagle's here:
>
> 0x9a0 ( mcasp0_aclkr.mmc0_sdwp ) = Routed to P9_42, (muxed with C18,
> to a shared pin on the header), so not connected to the microSD
> socket...
>
> https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglebone-black/blob/master/BBB_SCH.pdf
>
> Looking at this evm schematic, it looks like 0x9a0 should be removed
> too, but I'm not sure on all revisions:
>
> http://processors.wiki.ti.com/images/a/a2/TMDSSK3358_3H0009_REV1_2B_SCH.pdf

Hmm care to post a fix for this?

Regards,

Tony