On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Nikolaus Voss
<nikolaus.voss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
I'm not sure I understand how ->probe_new() is supposed to work
against i2c_id_table, but I don't care for legacy platform data
anyway.
What I would like to point to is device_get_match_data() API which
should simplify / unify the case how you get driver data.
This driver doesn't need any driver data/ platform_data beyond the
i2c_id_table name (which has already been matched when probe()/ probe_new()
is called), so strictly neither of_match_table nor apci_match_table would be
necessary, because i2c DT/ ACPI enumeration also matches against i2c_table
names.
Looking at the code I see still calls to acpi_match_data() and of_match_data().
Instead nowadays better to use device_get_match_data().
i2c_id_table should be removed from the module device table at least
(though you may continue to use it internally in the driver).