Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] PM / devfreq: Don't adjust to user limits in governors

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Matthias,

On 2018ë 07ì 04ì 08:46, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Several governors use the user space limits df->min/max_freq to adjust
> the target frequency. This is not necessary, since update_devfreq()
> already takes care of this. Instead the governor can request the available
> min/max frequency by setting the target frequency to DEVFREQ_MIN/MAX_FREQ
> and let update_devfreq() take care of any adjustments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - none
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - added 'Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>' tag
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - none
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - squashed "PM / devfreq: Remove redundant frequency adjustment from governors"
>   and "PM / devfreq: governors: Return device frequency limits instead of user
>   limits"
> - updated subject and commit message
> - use DEVFREQ_MIN/MAX_FREQ instead of df->scaling_min/max_freq
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/governor.h                |  3 +++
>  drivers/devfreq/governor_performance.c    |  5 +----
>  drivers/devfreq/governor_powersave.c      |  2 +-
>  drivers/devfreq/governor_simpleondemand.c | 12 +++---------
>  drivers/devfreq/governor_userspace.c      | 16 ++++------------
>  5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Actually, I preferred to use 'df->scaling_min/max_freq'
instead of DEVFREQ_MIN/MAX_FREQ. But, DEVFREQ_MIN/MAX_FREQ is other way. 

So, Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>

[snip]

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics