Re: [PATCH] cachefiles: fix multiple-put race.
From: David Howells
Date: Wed Jul 04 2018 - 05:15:06 EST
NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> + fscache_enqueue_retrieval(monitor->op);
> +
> spin_lock(&object->work_lock);
> list_add_tail(&monitor->op_link, &monitor->op->to_do);
> spin_unlock(&object->work_lock);
>
> - fscache_enqueue_retrieval(monitor->op);
That won't necessarily work because the work processor can then happen before
you've added the work to the to_do list.
I'm thinking that KiranKumar's solution might be the best one.
The problem is that cachefiles_read_waiter() doesn't have a ref on the monitor
object but is entirely dependent on the waitqueue lock for safety. I think
KiranKumar's patch is correct to take a ref before doing the queuing. It
might be possible to then pass this along to the work processor, but that
might be too fiddly.
Actually, I want to get rid of the page monitoring stuff entirely as it's
quite fragile and use an iterator and direct-IO instead, but we have to fix
this for now.
David