On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Nikolaus Voss
<nikolaus.voss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Nikolaus Voss
<nikolaus.voss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Nikolaus Voss
<nikolaus.voss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
struct i2c_device_id argument of probe() is not used, so use
probe_new()
instead.
This makes...
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, st_accel_id_table);
...this table obsolete IIUC. At least that's what I did when switched
to ->probe_new() in some drivers.
If I'm mistaken (again? :-) ) I would hear from someone to point me
how it can be used after a switch.
It is still used by the i2c-core in i2c_device_match() if DT and ACPI
matching fails.
And it is used to create the corresponding modaliases for
driver loading.
My question is "How?!"
I don't really see any points to match against it after switching to
->probe_new().
Could you point me to the code path in i2c (or OF?) core for that?
As written above in i2c-core-base.c: i2c_device_match() ->
i2c_match_id(driver->id_table,...
This is used for driver matching before probe() or probe_new() of the device
driver can be called. probe_new() actually is a function signature change
only.
Okay, IIUC we got a match. What should we do with it? The table is not
used in ->probe_new() (in i2c core), so, you can't say which line
matched there.