Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()

[Nikolaus Voss]

On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Nikolaus Voss
> <nikolaus.voss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

> But this discussion isn't really related to your patch. I think is
> correct but just said that (b) wasn't a justification to leave the I2C
> table, points (a) and (c) are though. I won't really be convinced that
> the fallback is the correct thing to do or even a good idea.

I didn't want to annoy you, I just wanted to understand why you think 
fallback is such a bad thing that you call it a bug. And I see, it has its 
drawbacks ;-). Anyway, thanks for taking the time to clarify this,

Niko

[snip]