Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the gfs2 tree

From: Andreas GrÃnbacher
Date: Wed Jul 04 2018 - 18:22:02 EST

Next message: Gustavo A. R. Silva: "[PATCH] net: core: filter: mark expected switch fall-through"
Previous message: Gustavo A. R. Silva: "[PATCH] char: amd64-agp: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the gfs2 tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

2018-07-04 23:57 GMT+02:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 07:55:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Commits
>>
>> 0627518adcc8 ("GFS2: rgrp free blocks used incorrectly")
>> b30cbec54def ("gfs2: Don't reject a supposedly full bitmap if we have blocks reserved")
>>
>> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>>
>> Not updated in the rebase.
>
> Just cc'ing the committer.

Yeah thanks, fixed now.

Andreas

Next message: Gustavo A. R. Silva: "[PATCH] net: core: filter: mark expected switch fall-through"
Previous message: Gustavo A. R. Silva: "[PATCH] char: amd64-agp: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the gfs2 tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]