Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Avoid divide by zero when rebalancing domains
From: Valentin Schneider
Date: Thu Jul 05 2018 - 06:10:52 EST
Hi,
On 04/07/18 15:24, Matt Fleming wrote:
> It's possible that the CPU doing nohz idle balance hasn't had its own
> load updated for many seconds. This can lead to huge deltas between
> rq->avg_stamp and rq->clock when rebalancing, and has been seen to
> cause the following crash:
>
> divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff810bcba8>] update_sd_lb_stats+0xe8/0x560
> [<ffffffff810bd04d>] find_busiest_group+0x2d/0x4b0
> [<ffffffff810bd640>] load_balance+0x170/0x950
> [<ffffffff810be3ff>] rebalance_domains+0x13f/0x290
> [<ffffffff810852bc>] __do_softirq+0xec/0x300
> [<ffffffff8108578a>] irq_exit+0xfa/0x110
> [<ffffffff816167d9>] reschedule_interrupt+0xc9/0xd0
>
Do you have some sort of reproducer for that crash? If not I guess I can cook
something up with a quiet userspace & rt-app, though I've never seen that one
on arm64.
> Make sure we update the rq clock and load before balancing.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 2f0a0be4d344..2c81662c858a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9597,6 +9597,16 @@ static bool _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags,
> */
> smp_mb();
>
> + /*
> + * Ensure this_rq's clock and load are up-to-date before we
> + * rebalance since it's possible that they haven't been
> + * updated for multiple schedule periods, i.e. many seconds.
> + */
> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
> + update_rq_clock(this_rq);
> + cpu_load_update_idle(this_rq);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&this_rq->lock);
> +
I'm failing to understand why the updates further down below are seemingly
not enough. After we've potentially done
update_rq_clock(rq);
cpu_load_update_idle(rq);
for all nohz cpus != this_cpu, we still end up doing:
if (idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) {
update_blocked_averages(this_cpu);
has_blocked_load |= this_rq->has_blocked_load;
}
which should properly update this_rq's clock and load before we attempt to do
any balancing on it.
> for_each_cpu(balance_cpu, nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
> if (balance_cpu == this_cpu || !idle_cpu(balance_cpu))
> continue;
>