Re: [PATCH] soc: r9a06g032: don't build SMP fiiles for non-SMP config

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 5:16 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Without CONFIG_SMP, we get a build failure:
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:5,
>>                  from arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:22,
>>                  from include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h:6,
>>                  from arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h:342,
>>                  from include/linux/bitops.h:18,
>>                  from include/linux/kernel.h:11,
>>                  from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18,
>>                  from arch/arm/include/asm/bug.h:60,
>>                  from include/linux/bug.h:5,
>>                  from include/linux/io.h:23,
>>                  from drivers/soc/renesas/r9a06g032-smp.c:11:
>> drivers/soc/renesas/r9a06g032-smp.c: In function 'r9a06g032_smp_boot_secondary':
>> drivers/soc/renesas/r9a06g032-smp.c:43:21: error: 'secondary_startup' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>   writel(__pa_symbol(secondary_startup), cpu_bootaddr);
>>                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> This makes the compilation of that file conditional on SMP support.
>> It would probably be better for consistency to leave that file
>> in arch/arm/mach-shmobile/, matching what we do for all other smp
>> operations.
>
> Shouldn't that comment be moved below the "---"? ;-)

Maybe

> I thought the (10Y ;-) plan was to have no more code under arch/arm/mach-*/?
> Note that the suport for the new RZ/N1D SoC doesn't use any other code in
> mach-shmobile.

The SMP code is the main part we never figured out where else to put,
so it's typically the only thing we still have for new platforms under
arch/arm/.

>> Fixes: cde4f86f9249 ("arm: shmobile: Add the R9A06G032 SMP enabler driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>