Re: [PATCH] Input: pxrc - fix leak of usb_device

[Alexey Khoroshilov]

Dear Marcus,

On 15.07.2018 10:42, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 08:51:09AM +0000, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 10:09:20AM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
>>> Hi Alexey,
>>>
>>> Good catch!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:07:57PM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
>>>> pxrc_probe() calls usb_get_dev(), but there is no usb_put_dev()
>>>> anywhere in the driver.
>>>>
>>>> The patch adds one to error handling code and to pxrc_isconnect().
>>>>
>>>> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Hmm, the biggest question however if we need to "take" the device, as I
>> do not think interface can outlive the device, and whether we actually
>> need to store it in pxrc, as we only need it during set up, as far as I
>> can see.
> 
> Yep, the device is only used during setup.
> I interpret the comments for usb_get_dev() as you should take a
> reference count on the device even if you only use the interface, but I
> could be wrong.
> 
>>From usb_get_dev()::
> 
> 	 * usb_get_dev - increments the reference count of the usb device structure
> 	 * @dev: the device being referenced
> 	 *
> 	 * Each live reference to a device should be refcounted.
> 	 *
> 	 * Drivers for USB interfaces should normally record such references in
> 	 * their probe() methods, when they bind to an interface, and release
> 	 * them by calling usb_put_dev(), in their disconnect() methods.
> 
> I can fix the driver to not take the device if that is what we want.
> If not Alexey want to fix it of course, it is his catch :-)

As far as I can see the proposed solution requires some refactoring of
the init code. So, I believe the author is in the better position to do
that.

Best regards,
Alexey